Relativism: Not Always BS

Matt Yglesias has made the argument that the real world is often no place for moral idealism. That is, sometimes a less desirable, but more realistic choice must be made simply because the more desirable choice is plainly infeasible. In this scenario, it might at first appear that voting against a less desirable solution is the correct moral choice, but given that voting against it may lead to no solution or an even less desirable solution, clearly the most moral position is to vote for the solution which combines the appropriate levels of potency and feasibility. Thus, I tend to agree with Kevin Drum: pass the damn bailout already. Even if not’s perfect, the political capital to pursue a (non unanimously viewed as betterplan is simply non-existent. Therefore, poiting to the expediency the rapidly devolving banking system (peace, Wachovia — you still has my monies?), it doesn’t make any sense to waste time lamenting the Swedish option.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: